They slashed utilization to 74% to control inventory and still printed 48.4% gross margins—that is structural pricing power.
Thesis: The street is mispricing the 'transition year' margin compression. The 100-200bps drag from SiC and 50-70bps from East Fishkill are temporary entry tickets to a $1B SiC revenue stream. With $16.6B in LTSAs (up $2.5B QoQ) and stable pricing, the revenue side is de-risked. The trade is buying the margin trough in H1 2023 before the structural benefits of the fab transition hit in 2024 ($160M benefit). The ability to hold 48% GM while cutting utilization to 74% proves the structural transformation is real.
Verdict: LONG — Conviction: HIGH
Catalyst: SiC gross margins hitting corporate average (parity) by exiting 2023, validating the yield ramp.
Key Risk: Hudson facility SiC yields failing to scale, extending the 200bps margin drag into 2024 and burning cash.
The Tell: The utilization drop. 'Lower factory utilization at 74% as we proactively slowed wafer starts.' Usually, a drop to 74% utilization murders gross margins due to fixed cost absorption. The fact they still hit 48.4% GM reveals their pricing power and cost structure improvement is stronger than the street gives them credit for.
Friction Level: MODERATE_FRICTION — Bulls see margin compression as temporary investment (SiC/EFK ramp). Bears see it as structural inefficiency and yield failure disguised as 'transitory'.
Report not found
The report data is no longer available. Please return to the archive.