They raised full-year guidance by 300-500bps and admitted they can't build tools fast enough to ship what customers want.
Thesis: ASML owns the only EUV bottleneck in the industry. Demand exceeds supply through 2028 by management's own admission, and they're still not building capacity fast enough. The bear case about a capacity ceiling is actually the bull case for pricing power into 2028. The EUR 500M Mistral revaluation flatters net income, but the operating beat is real: installed base EUR 400M above guide, 57.5% gross margin against a 56% full-year guide, and four-year order visibility.
Verdict: LONG — Conviction: HIGH
Catalyst: Q4 guide of EUR 14.2-15.2B on 57% gross margin, with installed base at EUR 3.7B. Value-based pricing conversations completed and start flowing into revenue in 2027.
Key Risk: Backlog four years out sits with room to be resized. China at ~20% of revenue carries export control escalation risk with no offsetting market of equal scale.
The Tell: Fouquet, unprompted: '30% in 2027, 30% in 2028 will not allow us to meet our customer demand. We have to do more.' He volunteered that his own capacity plan falls short of customer requests. That single admission tells you demand is real and ASML cannot ship enough to capture it.
Friction Level: MODERATE_FRICTION — Facts agree. The disagreement is whether ASML's own capacity ceiling is a constraint on revenue or a guarantee of pricing power into 2028-2030.
Report not found
The report data is no longer available. Please return to the archive.